A biomimetic membrane allows lithium ion separation by electrodialysis

http://english.cas.cn/newsroom/research_news/chem/202504/t20250427_1042154.shtml

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59188-1

A research team led by Prof. GAO Jun from the CAS Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology (QIBEBT) , in collaboration with researchers from Qingdao University, has developed an innovative membrane that mimics biological ion channels to achieve highly selective lithium ion separation from complex brines. Lithium, which is essential for batteries and clean energy technologies, is often found in low concentrations alongside high levels of sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium ions.

Inspired by biological ion channels, the team designed a sulfonic acid-functionalized covalent organic framework (COF)—r-TpPa-SO3H. The membrane’s randomly oriented nanocrystalline structure creates ultra-narrow, winding channels that can differentiate ions based on size and hydration energy. This unique structure enables an unconventional reverse-sieving mechanism that allows the selective passage of Na+, K+, and even divalent ions like Mg2+ and Ca2+ under an electric field while effectively blocking hydrated Li+ ions.

In laboratory tests, the membrane demonstrated remarkable Na+/Li+ and K+/Li+ selectivity, comparable to that of biological ion channels. Its performance remained stable in complex solutions, including real salt-lake brines. Under electrodialysis conditions, the membrane consistently removed major interfering ions, resulting in a lithium-enriched solution ready for downstream processing.

more insights

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950155525000667?via%3Dihub

https://www.cas.cn/syky/202511/t20251125_5089765.shtml

A research team at the CAS Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology has proposed a novel artificial carbon fixation pathway—LATCH which comprises 10 completely known enzymatic steps. Each cycle converts two molecules of HCO₃⁻ into one molecule of acetyl-CoA, requiring only adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and reduced coenzyme II for energy. Kinetic and thermodynamic modeling analysis shows that it is a linear autocatalytic cycle structure without kinetic traps or thermodynamic barriers, possessing high feasibility and potential for continued development. It can provide insights for improving the efficiency of systems such as photosynthetic microorganisms, plants, and engineered cell factories.

Regarding the selection of parental modules, the research team referenced research on the serine cycle and designed a modified version of the serine cycle, simplifying the pathway structure and bypassing the inefficient steps involving hydroxypyruvate, thus enabling the pathway to function effectively in the heterologous host *E. coli*. Simultaneously, the team replaced the amino acid deamination and transamination steps in the serine cycle with a decarboxylation process, forming an MCG cycle free from formic acid dependence. This cycle can further convert glycerate 3-phosphate produced by processes such as the Calvin cycle and glycolysis into acetyl-CoA in a negative carbon mode. The study also referenced a series of photorespiration bypass concepts developed for recovering the Rubisco byproduct glycolate-2-phosphate, among which the TaCo module, due to its artificial carboxylation reaction, theoretically has a maximum yield of 150%. This study found that by introducing glyoxylate reductase as a key step to act as a “molecular latch,” the natural serine cycle and the artificially carboxylated module TaCo can be recombined, resulting in a functional transformation—from two parent modules dependent on organic substrates to a complete carbon-fixing cycle.

Based on the LATCH cycle formed by module integration, kinetic analysis shows that this pathway is a linear autocatalytic cycle, theoretically avoiding kinetic traps while eliminating the need to establish complex regulatory relationships. Meanwhile, eight steps in the pathway receive thermodynamic support from adenosine triphosphate (ATP), reducing power, or high-energy substrates, and the remaining two lyase-catalyzed processes do not pose thermodynamic bottlenecks. These inherent advantages at the stoichiometric, kinetic, and thermodynamic levels lay the foundation for the continued development and application of LATCH.

https://www.nature.com/nature-index/supplements/nature-index-2025-science-cities/tables/overall

https://en.people.cn/n3/2025/1118/c90000-20391615.html

The newly released “Nature Index 2025 Science Cities” supplement shows that the number of Chinese cities in the global top ten rose from five in 2023 to six in 2024, marking the first time China holds a majority in the rankings.

The supplement draws on the Nature Index database, which tracks research articles published from 2015 to 2024. Its analysis uses “Share”, a fractional count reflecting institutional contribution to publications, as the primary metric, with time-series data adjusted to 2024 levels. Each city’s Share is calculated by summing the contributions of all affiliated institutions located within that city.

According to the Nature Index, the world’s leading science cities overall are: Beijing, Shanghai, New York metropolitan area (U.S.), Boston metropolitan area (U.S.), Nanjing (China), Guangzhou (China), San Francisco Bay Area (U.S.), Wuhan (China), Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area (U.S.), and Hangzhou (China).

Further analysis shows that Chinese cities hold a strong advantage in chemistry, physical sciences, and earth and environmental sciences, leading the global rankings in all three fields. Notably, Chinese cities claimed all of the top ten positions in chemistry for the first time. In the other two subject areas, they secured six of the top ten spots, with Beijing ranking first worldwide across all three domains.

European cities in the ranking start at 19 (London), followed by Zurich (28), Cambridge (29), Munich (30) and Berlin (32), following Qingdao at position 31.

Green Carbon is a Quarterly Scientific Open Access Journal published by KeAi and Elsevier https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/green-carbon

The editorial office is located at the CAS Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Environmental Technology, Qingdao, China. The international advisory board has 55 members, including 23 from Europe.

Since September 2093, it has published 108 articles through 9 issues.

Special issue topics included

  • Green biomanufacturing
  • Green chemical catalysis
  • Green photoelectric catalysis
  • C1 conversion
  • Green carbon biomanufacturing

Green Carbon is indexed by CAS, SCOPUS (immediate citescore: 14,9), DOAJ, and under full editorial evaluation for inclusion in the ESCI index.

Until now and probably throughout 2026, Green Carbon operates an APC policy free-of-charge

 Beyond a journal, Green Carbon, through its host institute CAS QIBEBT, has developed into an international academic exchange platform, which has hosted recent conferences on Green Carbon, Phototrophic Prokaryotes, Clostridia and more, see http://english.qibebt.cas.cn

For further information, consult with the Green Carbon website https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/green-carbon or with the Green Carbon Offices in Germany through https://window-to-china.de/green_carbon/

Back to …